%
2024-03-13 21:00:38 UTC
Life was not created by "god." That's only a childish fair tale.
Where did the RNA come from?can be synthesised into complex molecules, some significant
to terrestrial life, with modest input energy like
ultraviolet light or electric discharges.
Additional experiments show some molecules have limitted abiotic
creation and longetivity.
We mostly know how DNA is replicated using proteins. RNA
replication without proteins? That's what the news is about, an
example of replicating RNA without bootstrapping proteins.
We got theories to take us from models of early earth almost to
most of the molecules of inefficient but possible
life. Best on chance and organic chemistry without needing
a god. It's rational for a person to conclude we will be
able to explain everything without a god.
There's no evidence a god was not involved. It remains
that it is as rational to believe in a creator god as to
disbelieve.
It comes done to choice, an unforced choice, to believe or
disbelieve.
don't solve anything.
irrelevant. Reality is what reality is, and we're whistling past
the graveyard with all our theories and philosophies.
Belief and disbelief are equally rational.
only one "disbelief". As the "beliefs" contradict each other, at
least in some respects, they cannot all be true; how to
choose? On the other hand, "disbelief" is at least falsifiable,
which makes it more rational than all the others, because
"disbelief" opens itself up to being proved wrong.
amputee, and then let's talk.
interested in this, too!! ;-P