Israel’s leading paper says its own army deliberately killed Israelis on October 7

[NefeshBarYochai]

Three days ago, Israel’s leading newspaper, Haaretz, published the
results of its thorough, comprehensive investigation into what
actually happened when Hamas attacked on October 7. So far, the U.S.
mainstream media has not said a word about the shocking results of
that investigation. Critics sometimes use the expression “media
malpractice” to describe the American mainstream’s failure to report
accurately about Israel/Palestine. This time, though, what’s happening
is even worse; it has to be deliberate self-censorship, designed to
hide the truth from the U.S. audience.

Haaretz’s long report found that Israel’s army had employed the
“Hannibal Directive” on October 7. The Directive is an Israeli policy
that instructs the military to open fire on its own soldiers to
prevent them from being taken captive. Of course, this site, alongside
other alternative media sources, was one of the first to point out the
possible role of the Hannibal Directive in Israeli deaths on October
7. But the Haaretz report was significant in the number of military
sources it interviewed who confirmed that there were direct orders to
implement the Directive.

Haaretz explained that the policy has “the intent of foiling
kidnapping even at the expense of the lives of the kidnapped.” At
first, the army started deploying “Ziks,” unmanned assault drones.
Later, the army fired mortars, and then artillery shells. Haaretz also
confirmed that the military did know that Israeli civilians had also
been taken hostage, but, nonetheless, at 11:22 a.m. the order came
down: “Not a single vehicle can return to Gaza.”

The Haaretz report is cautious, but it still concludes: “[The 11:22
a.m. message] was understood by everyone. . . At this point, the IDF
was not aware of the extent of kidnapping along the Gaza border, but
it did know that many people were involved. Thus, it was entirely
clear what the message meant, and what the fate of some of the
kidnapped people would be.”

In other words, some — possibly many — of the Israeli deaths that
day, including civilians, were deliberately caused by Israel’s own
military. How this is not news is incomprehensible. But, three days
later, in the New York Times: not a word. The Washington Post:
nothing. CNN: nothing. National Public Radio: nada.

Instead, if you plug “Hannibal” into the search engines at these media
sites, the results only mention “Hannibal Lecter,” the fictional
serial killer who was the subject of a book and popular film.

But there’s nothing new about the Israeli military’s Hannibal
Directive. (The doctrine is probably named for the Carthaginian
general who fought Rome in 200 B.C., who said he would swallow poison
instead of surrendering. Some Israeli sources claimed that the name
was randomly generated, an assertion that prompts skepticism.)

Way back on October 22, this site reported :

“A growing number of reports indicate Israeli forces responsible for
Israeli civilian and military deaths following October 7 attack.”

Then, last March, the estimable Jonathan Ofir also posted here that an
actual Israeli soldier, Captain Bar Zonshein, had admitted to “firing
tank shells on vehicles carrying Israeli civilians.”

The even more comprehensive Haaretz investigation should have prompted
a reaction from the mainstream U.S. reporters who are stationed in
Israel. American journalists should have been cultivating their own
sources since October 7, and been ready to at least match the Haaretz
article. Instead, the only response so far has been a panel hosted by
Piers Morgan, and a Mehdi Hasan/Bassem Youssef podcast.

I’ve followed the U.S. media coverage of Israel/Palestine closely for
more than a decade now. Continuing to hide Israel’s deployment of the
Hannibal Directive on October 7 is one of the most offensive examples
of self-censorship that I can recall. The mainstream’s dishonesty is
just one more example of why alternative websites are indispensable.

https://mondoweiss.net/2024/07/israels-leading-paper-says-its-own-army-deliberately-killed-israelis-on-october-7-but-in-the-u-s-media-silence/

[%]

Three days ago, Israel’s leading newspaper, Haaretz, published the
results of its thorough, comprehensive investigation into what
actually happened when Hamas attacked on October 7. So far, the U.S.
mainstream media has not said a word about the shocking results of
that investigation. Critics sometimes use the expression “media
malpractice” to describe the American mainstream’s failure to report
accurately about Israel/Palestine. This time, though, what’s happening
is even worse; it has to be deliberate self-censorship, designed to
hide the truth from the U.S. audience.
Haaretz’s long report found that Israel’s army had employed the
“Hannibal Directive” on October 7. The Directive is an Israeli policy
that instructs the military to open fire on its own soldiers to
prevent them from being taken captive. Of course, this site, alongside
other alternative media sources, was one of the first to point out the
possible role of the Hannibal Directive in Israeli deaths on October
7. But the Haaretz report was significant in the number of military
sources it interviewed who confirmed that there were direct orders to
implement the Directive.
Haaretz explained that the policy has “the intent of foiling
kidnapping even at the expense of the lives of the kidnapped.” At
first, the army started deploying “Ziks,” unmanned assault drones.
Later, the army fired mortars, and then artillery shells. Haaretz also
confirmed that the military did know that Israeli civilians had also
been taken hostage, but, nonetheless, at 11:22 a.m. the order came
down: “Not a single vehicle can return to Gaza.”
The Haaretz report is cautious, but it still concludes: “[The 11:22
a.m. message] was understood by everyone. . . At this point, the IDF
was not aware of the extent of kidnapping along the Gaza border, but
it did know that many people were involved. Thus, it was entirely
clear what the message meant, and what the fate of some of the
kidnapped people would be.”
In other words, some — possibly many — of the Israeli deaths that
day, including civilians, were deliberately caused by Israel’s own
military. How this is not news is incomprehensible. But, three days
nothing. CNN: nothing. National Public Radio: nada.
Instead, if you plug “Hannibal” into the search engines at these media
sites, the results only mention “Hannibal Lecter,” the fictional
serial killer who was the subject of a book and popular film.
But there’s nothing new about the Israeli military’s Hannibal
Directive. (The doctrine is probably named for the Carthaginian
general who fought Rome in 200 B.C., who said he would swallow poison
instead of surrendering. Some Israeli sources claimed that the name
was randomly generated, an assertion that prompts skepticism.)
“A growing number of reports indicate Israeli forces responsible for
Israeli civilian and military deaths following October 7 attack.”
Then, last March, the estimable Jonathan Ofir also posted here that an
actual Israeli soldier, Captain Bar Zonshein, had admitted to “firing
tank shells on vehicles carrying Israeli civilians.”
The even more comprehensive Haaretz investigation should have prompted
a reaction from the mainstream U.S. reporters who are stationed in
Israel. American journalists should have been cultivating their own
sources since October 7, and been ready to at least match the Haaretz
article. Instead, the only response so far has been a panel hosted by
Piers Morgan, and a Mehdi Hasan/Bassem Youssef podcast.
I’ve followed the U.S. media coverage of Israel/Palestine closely for
more than a decade now. Continuing to hide Israel’s deployment of the
Hannibal Directive on October 7 is one of the most offensive examples
of self-censorship that I can recall. The mainstream’s dishonesty is
just one more example of why alternative websites are indispensable.
https://mondoweiss.net/2024/07/israels-leading-paper-says-its-own-army-deliberately-killed-israelis-on-october-7-but-in-the-u-s-media-silence/

shuddup