Why Right Wing Men Beat Their Ugly Wives

[%]

In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.

i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.

It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.

meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?

Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.

so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.

i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up

[Governor Swill]

Post by %

In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.

i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.

It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.

meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?

Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.

so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.

i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Good one!

I'm outta here!
<https://www.gocomics.com/robert-ariail/2024/08/26>



--
"Of all the things that I hated about my childhood, nothing
compared to the revolving door of father figures." -- JD Vance

#NEVERtrump

[Tony]

Post by %

In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.

i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.

It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.

meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?

Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.

so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.

i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up

I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.

[kami]

Post by Tony

Post by %

In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.

i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.

It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.

meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?

Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.

so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.

i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up

I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.

hi tony, are you italian?

[%]

Post by kami

Post by Tony

Post by %

In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.

i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.

It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.

meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?

Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.

so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.

i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up

I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.

hi tony, are you italian?

a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst

[kami]

Post by %

Post by kami

Post by Tony

Post by %

In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.

i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.

It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.

meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?

Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.

so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.

i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up

I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.

hi tony, are you italian?

a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst

his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?


btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?

[%]

Post by kami

Post by %

Post by kami

Post by Tony

Post by %

In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.

i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.

It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.

meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?

Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.

so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.

i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up

I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.

hi tony, are you italian?

a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst

his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?

well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people