Discussion:
Why Right Wing Men Beat Their Ugly Wives
(too old to reply)
%
2024-08-29 18:17:47 UTC
Permalink
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
Governor Swill
2024-08-29 23:18:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Good one!

I'm outta here!
<https://www.gocomics.com/robert-ariail/2024/08/26>



--
"Of all the things that I hated about my childhood, nothing
compared to the revolving door of father figures." -- JD Vance

#NEVERtrump
Tony
2024-09-12 19:18:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
kami
2024-09-13 14:56:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
%
2024-09-13 19:05:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
kami
2024-09-14 12:54:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?


btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
%
2024-09-14 17:47:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
kami
2024-09-15 05:36:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
well... there's a new sixtyplus person born each day.
Citizen Smith
2024-09-15 10:06:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
well... there's a new sixtyplus person born each day.
The vast majority of usenet poasters are over sixty.
Fat Dave, aka peescent, aka % likes everyone to think of him as a young virile
guy. He' not. In reality he's a fat stuck at home spastic drug addict that has
spent the last 30 years wrecking froups and doing nothing else with his life. A
big fat loser.

And with that I'll leave you. I pop in every now and again to see if any of the
old regulars that used to poast here are here. Sadly all I see are Fat Dave
droppings.
Brennus
2024-09-15 14:22:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Citizen Smith
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether
recent developments in the populist radical right¢s
messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse
and their evolution towards economic chauvinism, has
changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the
eighth wave of the European Social Survey (ESS), the
authors find that two traditional explanations for the
gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results
indicate that the ideological moderation hypothesis no
longer applies; that is, anti- immigration sentiment and
a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical
right for female voters as they are for male voters.
Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men
than for women to vote for the populist radical right.
Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a
bulwark against supporting the populist radical right
for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist
radical right than older women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic
violence is an integral element of the populist right-wing
agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you
know i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently
proselytizing religion, there seems to be no one there. it is
ridiculous the double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or
something like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the
wheel about 2,000 years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
well... there's a new sixtyplus person born each day.
The vast majority of usenet poasters are over sixty.
Fat Dave, aka peescent, aka % likes everyone to think of him as a
young virile guy. He' not. In reality he's a fat stuck at home spastic
drug addict that has spent the last 30 years wrecking froups and doing
nothing else with his life. A big fat loser.
And with that I'll leave you. I pop in every now and again to see if
any of the old regulars that used to poast here are here. Sadly all I
see are Fat Dave droppings.
Learn how to use a killfile, dumbass.
Citizen Smith
2024-09-15 15:36:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brennus
Post by Citizen Smith
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether
recent developments in the populist radical right¢s
messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse
and their evolution towards economic chauvinism, has
changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the
eighth wave of the European Social Survey (ESS), the
authors find that two traditional explanations for the
gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results
indicate that the ideological moderation hypothesis no
longer applies; that is, anti- immigration sentiment and
a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical
right for female voters as they are for male voters.
Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men
than for women to vote for the populist radical right.
Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a
bulwark against supporting the populist radical right
for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist
radical right than older women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly
or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic
violence is an integral element of the populist right-wing
agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you
know i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently
proselytizing religion, there seems to be no one there. it is
ridiculous the double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or
something like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the
wheel about 2,000 years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
well... there's a new sixtyplus person born each day.
The vast majority of usenet poasters are over sixty.
Fat Dave, aka peescent, aka % likes everyone to think of him as a
young virile guy. He' not. In reality he's a fat stuck at home spastic
drug addict that has spent the last 30 years wrecking froups and doing
nothing else with his life. A big fat loser.
And with that I'll leave you. I pop in every now and again to see if
any of the old regulars that used to poast here are here. Sadly all I
see are Fat Dave droppings.
Learn how to use a killfile, dumbass.
GFY, lardarse.
%
2024-09-15 19:16:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Citizen Smith
Post by Brennus
Post by Citizen Smith
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether
recent developments in the populist radical right¢s
messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse
and their evolution towards economic chauvinism, has
changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the
eighth wave of the European Social Survey (ESS), the
authors find that two traditional explanations for the
gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results
indicate that the ideological moderation hypothesis no
longer applies; that is, anti- immigration sentiment and
a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical
right for female voters as they are for male voters.
Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men
than for women to vote for the populist radical right.
Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a
bulwark against supporting the populist radical right
for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist
radical right than older women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic
violence is an integral element of the populist right-wing
agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you
know i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently
proselytizing religion, there seems to be no one there. it is
ridiculous the double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or
something like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the
wheel about 2,000 years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
well... there's a new sixtyplus person born each day.
The vast majority of usenet poasters are over sixty.
Fat Dave, aka peescent, aka % likes everyone to think of him as a
young virile guy. He' not. In reality he's a fat stuck at home spastic
drug addict that has spent the last 30 years wrecking froups and doing
nothing else with his life. A big fat loser.
And with that I'll leave you. I pop in every now and again to see if
any of the old regulars that used to poast here are here. Sadly all I
see are Fat Dave droppings.
Learn how to use a killfile, dumbass.
GFY, lardarse.
dumbass dumbass you got called a dumbass
%
2024-09-15 19:17:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Citizen Smith
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
well... there's a new sixtyplus person born each day.
The vast majority of usenet poasters are over sixty.
Fat Dave, aka peescent, aka % likes everyone to think of him as a young virile
guy. He' not. In reality he's a fat stuck at home spastic drug addict that has
spent the last 30 years wrecking froups and doing nothing else with his life. A
big fat loser.
And with that I'll leave you. I pop in every now and again to see if any of the
old regulars that used to poast here are here. Sadly all I see are Fat Dave
droppings.
i will always be here

%
2024-09-15 12:12:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by %
Post by kami
Post by Tony
Post by %
In this article, Stockemer and Normandin test whether recent developments in
the populist radical right¢s messaging, such as the strategic introduction of
gender equality in these parties¢ political discourse and their evolution
towards economic chauvinism, has changed women¢s and men¢s propensity to vote
for the populist radical right. Using data from the eighth wave of the
European Social Survey (ESS), the authors find that two traditional
explanations for the gender gap in voting for the populist radical right have
lost their explanatory power. First, their results indicate that the
ideological moderation hypothesis no longer applies; that is, anti-
immigration sentiment and a rightist ideology are currently as much of a
reason to cast their ballot for the populist radical right for female voters
as they are for male voters. Second, they no longer find support that
economic dissatisfaction is a stronger driver for men than for women to vote
for the populist radical right. Rather, their results indicate the contrary.
In addition, they find that education is more of a bulwark against supporting
the populist radical right for women. Finally, their results illustrate that
older men are more likely to vote for the populist radical right than older
women.
i dont see anything about men beating their wives, ugly or not.
It is common knowledge that male-on-female domestic violence is an integral
element of the populist right-wing agenda.
meaning they want to promote wife beating as a policy?
Perhaps wife owning would be a better term.
so hints of islam, might as well cover them completely. you know
i visited alt.religion.islam, but for a violently proselytizing
religion, there seems to be no one there. it is ridiculous the
double standard being bestowed upon islam.
i have an islamic sex doll, it blows itself up
I know that Islam bullshit where they worship cow turds or something
like that. Even the caveman invented fire and the wheel about 2,000
years before they did in Islam Land.
hi tony, are you italian?
a little profiling here all european men are named tony ,
and asians are all david and swedes are all horst
his email is deliking, tony deliking, you are telling me he is
not italian?
btw i just noticed, sixtyplus? what is that? is that a fat group?
well it's really not up to me to give out info he might be keeping
sixty plus is an oldies group ,
it's a near dead group now but ,
it used to have lots of over sixty people
well... there's a new sixtyplus person born each day.
http://tinyurl.com/peescent
Loading...